Abstract
The size premium has been challenged along many fronts: it has a
weak historical record, varies significantly over time, in particular
weakening after its discovery in the early 1980s, is concentrated among
microcap stocks, predominantly resides in January, is not present for
measures of size that do not rely on market prices, is weak
internationally, and is subsumed by proxies for illiquidity. We find,
however, that these challenges are dismantled when controlling for the
quality, or the inverse “junk”, of a firm. A significant size premium
emerges, which is stable through time, robust to the specification, more
consistent across seasons and markets, not concentrated in microcaps,
robust to non-price based measures of size, and not captured by an
illiquidity premium. Controlling for quality/junk also explains
interactions between size and other return characteristics such as value
and momentum.
No comments:
Post a Comment